Today’s Current Affairs: Supreme Court Orders Immediate Release of NewsClick Founder
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has declared the arrest of NewsClick founder Prabir Purkayastha as illegal and ordered his immediate release. The court stated that the grounds of arrest were not provided, making the arrest void. This decision highlights the importance of following due process and upholding the rights of individuals, even in cases involving national security concerns. The case underscores the need for transparency and accountability in law enforcement actions to ensure justice is served fairly and impartially. This ruling sets a precedent for protecting civil liberties and preventing arbitrary arrests in the future. Stay tuned for more updates on this evolving story.
Question 1: When was Prabir Purkayastha arrested under the UAPA law?
– A) October 1
– B) October 2
– C) October 3
– D) October 4
Question 2: What did the Supreme Court declare regarding Prabir Purkayastha’s arrest?
– A) Legal
– B) Invalid
– C) Justified
– D) Unnecessary
Question 3: What did the Supreme Court say about the grounds of arrest in Prabir Purkayastha’s case?
– A) They were provided
– B) They were not provided
– C) They were unnecessary
– D) They were delayed
Question 4: What law was Prabir Purkayastha arrested under?
– A) UAPA
– B) IPC
– C) CrPC
– D) RTI
Question 5: Who argued in favor of the police in Prabir Purkayastha’s case?
– A) Kapil Sibal
– B) SV Raju
– C) Prabir Purkayastha
– D) Sandeep Mehta
Question 6: What did the Delhi Police accuse NewsClick and Prabir Purkayastha of in the chargesheet?
– A) Fraud
– B) Corruption
– C) Terror funding and promoting Chinese propaganda
– D) Bribery
Question 7: What did a court allow NewsClick’s HR head Amit Chakravarty to do in the case?
– A) Bail
– B) Turn approver
– C) Represent himself
– D) Stay in custody
Question 8: What funding allegation was made against NewsClick in a New York Times investigation?
– A) Russian funding
– B) Indian funding
– C) Chinese propaganda
– D) European funding
Question 9: What did the Supreme Court order regarding Prabir Purkayastha’s release?
– A) Delayed
– B) Immediate
– C) Conditional
– D) Rejected
Question 10: What did the trial court have to do in Prabir Purkayastha’s case?
– A) Sentence him
– B) Impose bail conditions
– C) Acquit him
– D) Fine him
**Scroll Down Answers**
1. Why was Prabir Purkayastha arrested?
Prabir Purkayastha was arrested under the anti-terror law, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, after a New York Times investigation alleged that NewsClick had received funding from a network pushing Chinese propaganda.
2. What did the Supreme Court rule regarding Prabir Purkayastha’s arrest?
The Supreme Court declared that Prabir Purkayastha’s arrest by the Delhi Police was illegal as the grounds of arrest were not provided in writing, making the arrest void.
3. What did the trial court decide regarding Prabir Purkayastha’s bail conditions?
The trial court will impose the bail conditions on Prabir Purkayastha following the Supreme Court’s order for his release.
4. What did Additional Solicitor General SV Raju say about the police’s powers to arrest despite the ruling?
ASG SV Raju mentioned that while Prabir Purkayastha’s arrest was declared void, it does not stop the police from exercising their correct powers to arrest as permitted by law.
5. When was Prabir Purkayastha arrested and what allegations were made against him?
Prabir Purkayastha was arrested on October 3 under the UAPA law, following allegations of terror funding and promoting Chinese propaganda made by the Delhi Police in an 8,000-page chargesheet.
In today's current affairs, the Supreme Court has ordered the immediate release of NewsClick founder Prabir Purkayastha, stating that his arrest under the anti-terror law was illegal. The court found that the grounds of arrest were not provided, making his arrest void. The trial court will now impose bail conditions on Mr. Purkayastha. This decision comes after a March judgment by the Supreme Court emphasizing the need to provide grounds of arrest in writing to the accused. Mr. Purkayastha was arrested on October 3 under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act after allegations of receiving funding from a network promoting Chinese propaganda. The court also allowed NewsClick's HR head, Amit Chakravarty, to turn approver in the case.
